Posts Tagged ‘Car Collision’

Failure to Wear Seatbelts Prevents Car Accident Recoveries

February 6th, 2010



The Vehicle Code in the State of California requires all the drivers including their passengers to wear their respective seatbelts every time they travel. No one is exempted from such rule that aims to prevent or at least lessen the occurrence of serious and fatal injuries in case a car collision happens. All of those who will be caught violating this law will be subjected to an offense.

The California government believes that seatbelts indeed, save lives. This is the main reason why sufficient signs and billboards have been situated on our roads and highways, allowing the motorists to understand the value of seatbelts. Their slogan “Click it or Ticket” makes a lot of sense and creates a slight decrease in the number of injuries and fatalities caused by vehicular accidents.

In spite of this, traffic accident occurrences seem to be unstoppable. Thousands of people are still involved in various car mishaps everyday. Due to this, the victims in order to seek justice and recover suitable damages for their injuries or loss of a loved one are filing numerous car accident claims in courts.

Under the law, the failure to wear seatbelts in traveling may jeopardize or limit a victim’s right to recover damages from the liable party after a road collision. This is because the law believes that the victims might not have incurred much damage if only they were able to buckle-up.

The law maintains that whosoever individual who has been neglectful in exercising due prudence, which can brought about risks to other people, should be accountable for the harm that resulted. A person’s failure to wear seatbelt constitutes negligence on his part. Thus, this carelessness may be considered as a ground that forbids him to recover damages from the other party, no matter the degree of his fault in the accident.

Many defense lawyers utilize the same rationale especially if their clients accepted their fault in the accident. They thoroughly determine whether the plaintiff has committed any violation in order to nullify the case. If they were able to prove the comparative fault of the victims, the courts would most likely repeal the case filed against their clients.

Nonetheless, any personal injury action will have better probability of gaining a positive result if the plaintiff are assured that he has not been neglectful in exercising due care in his dealings – that he has not committed any offense.

By: Rainier Policarpio

When Should You File a Lawsuit After a Car Accident?

January 22nd, 2010



An experienced lawyer knows the importance of timing when it comes to settling car accident injury claims. But before getting into the details of when to file and the tactics used by some insurance companies, a quick look at car accident statistics in Compton, California may help.

Car Accidents in Compton Cause Daily Tragedies

Statistics compiled by the California Highway Patrol’s Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System (SWITRS) showed that in 2006, nine people lost their lives and 359 people were injured in Compton car crashes. Three pedestrians were killed and 27 were injured in motor vehicle mishaps. And bicycle accidents injured 18. In addition, motorcycle accidents killed one and injured 20 people. Those who insisted on drinking and driving caused four deaths and 38 injuries. During 2007, eight car accidents resulted in as many fatalities. The following year, nine car collisions caused nine deaths.

Timing is Key when Settling Car Accident Injury Claims

Successful Compton car collision lawyers know that timing can mean the difference between a fair compensation settlement, an unfair one, or none at all. While you certainly want to make sure that your injuries are thoroughly diagnosed and treated, you don’t want to let the statute of limitations – two years in California – expire. Do that and you lose your rights and an insurance adjuster will tell you that the insurance company won’t have to pay you for your injuries or your losses.

Waiting too long for filing your lawsuit leaves you open for another tactic employed by insurance companies–the insurance adjuster becomes hard nosed and/or hard to reach during the last 90 days before the statute of limitations runs out. What they’re counting on is your eagerness to settle at this point, and that you’ll accept a much lower settlement sum. As the filing deadline nears, they hope that you’ll lose the patience and personal fortitude to even file a lawsuit.

This tactic is most often used when dealing with clients who are not represented by a car accident lawyer or with law firms that rarely go to trial. Adjusters are fully aware of law firms that simply settle out of court and they suddenly become hard to reach and even tougher to bargain with.

By: J. Bisnar