The Vehicle Code in the State of California requires all the drivers including their passengers to wear their respective seatbelts every time they travel. No one is exempted from such rule that aims to prevent or at least lessen the occurrence of serious and fatal injuries in case a car collision happens. All of those who will be caught violating this law will be subjected to an offense.
The California government believes that seatbelts indeed, save lives. This is the main reason why sufficient signs and billboards have been situated on our roads and highways, allowing the motorists to understand the value of seatbelts. Their slogan “Click it or Ticket” makes a lot of sense and creates a slight decrease in the number of injuries and fatalities caused by vehicular accidents.
In spite of this, traffic accident occurrences seem to be unstoppable. Thousands of people are still involved in various car mishaps everyday. Due to this, the victims in order to seek justice and recover suitable damages for their injuries or loss of a loved one are filing numerous car accident claims in courts.
Under the law, the failure to wear seatbelts in traveling may jeopardize or limit a victim’s right to recover damages from the liable party after a road collision. This is because the law believes that the victims might not have incurred much damage if only they were able to buckle-up.
The law maintains that whosoever individual who has been neglectful in exercising due prudence, which can brought about risks to other people, should be accountable for the harm that resulted. A person’s failure to wear seatbelt constitutes negligence on his part. Thus, this carelessness may be considered as a ground that forbids him to recover damages from the other party, no matter the degree of his fault in the accident.
Many defense lawyers utilize the same rationale especially if their clients accepted their fault in the accident. They thoroughly determine whether the plaintiff has committed any violation in order to nullify the case. If they were able to prove the comparative fault of the victims, the courts would most likely repeal the case filed against their clients.
Nonetheless, any personal injury action will have better probability of gaining a positive result if the plaintiff are assured that he has not been neglectful in exercising due care in his dealings – that he has not committed any offense.
By: Rainier Policarpio
Posts Tagged ‘Rationale’
Failure to Wear Seatbelts Prevents Car Accident Recoveries
February 6th, 2010Legal Ethics – Is It Proper For A NY Lawyer To Solicit An Accident Victim After A Car Crash?
November 3rd, 2009
Q: My mother was in a car accident last week, and already she’s gotten letters from lawyers asking if she’s ok, and if she wants a lawyer? Is it ethical for a lawyer to send such a letter?
A: First, I hope she is feeling better. Second, in limited circumstances in New York, it may be acceptable for an attorney to send such a letter to a victim of an accident. The majority of lawyers feel such a letter to a victims’ home is demeaning and degrading. Some lawyers feel this is nothing but a solicitation, which is clearly not permitted in New York. Other attorneys (the ones who send these letters) feel that it may be their only chance to entice the injured victim to come to them as a client.
The letter is supposed to only offer them legal assistance and guidance- should they want it. Again, how do you choose which attorney to use when you’re inundated with a flood of letters from different lawyers promising to help you with your accident claim?
The answer is simpler than you think. Ask yourself why a an attorney would even bother to send such a letter. Are they really that desperate to need to send such a letter? How did they get your name anyway? I’ll tell you how- maybe it came from the tow truck operator who took your car away. Maybe it was from an ambulance technician. Maybe it was from a police blotter at the police station. (That’s public information that many investigators working for lawyers troll for in various police stations).
Ask yourself another question. Do you let a stranger into your house simply because he says he saw you need a paint job, and amazingly, he’s a painter who is willing to paint your house for a great price? Did you call him? No. Did you seek out other customers of his to determine if he’s reliable and professional? No. He just showed up while trolling through the neighborhood. Is this the type of painter you want working in your house? I don’t think so.
The same rationale holds true for a lawyer that sends you an unsolicited letter following an accident. What do you know about that lawyer? Probably nothing. Does that mean that he (or she) isn’t a good lawyer? No. But, again, think who you want for your attorney. Does it help knowing that your lawyer gets many cases this way, by sending out unsolicited lawyer letters hoping that a few unknowing people will answer the letter? The choice, as always is yours. Make an informed choice.
By: Gerry Oginski